Obama Wants Bailed Out Banks to Modify Loans But Banks Don’t Want Play

President Obama presented a plan shortly after taking office to keep Americans in their homes by giving banks the taxpayers’ money in order for the bailed out banks to rework loans so mortgage payments can be reduced. But the banks have failed to do that as they have failed at everything else for the American economy and its people.

How long will Americans wait for results as jobless rates rise to an high since 1983 and more people lose their homes?  Take this poll:  http://www.misterpoll.com/polls/427966

Loan modifications rise; many don’t pare payments
Foreclosure prevention efforts grow, but fewer than half of loan modifications reduce payments

  • Friday April 3, 2009, 10:10 am EDT

WASHINGTON (AP) — Lenders are boosting their attempts to avoid home foreclosures, but fewer than half of loan modifications made at the end of last year actually reduced borrowers’ payments by more than 10 percent, data released Friday show.

The report, based on an analysis of nearly 35 million loans worth more than $6 trillion, was published by the federal Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Office of Thrift Supervision. It provides the most detailed and broad analysis to date of efforts to stem the foreclosure crisis.

Among loan modifications made in the October-December quarter, about 37 percent resulted in a drop in payments of more than 10 percent, compared with about one-fourth in the first nine months of the year. Regulators saw that growth as a positive sign.

“The trend toward lowering payments to make home mortgages more affordable is moving in the right direction,” John Bowman, acting director of the Office of Thrift Supervision, said in a prepared statement.

Still, nearly one in four loan modifications in the fourth quarter actually resulted in increased monthly payments. That situation can happen when lenders add fees or past-due interest to a loan and spread those payments out over the 30- or 40-year period.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the report found that loans were far less likely to fall back into default if a borrower’s monthly payment is reduced by a healthy amount.

Nine months after modification, about 26 percent of loans in which payments had dropped by 10 percent or more had fallen back into default. That compares with about half of loans in which the payment was unchanged or increased.

“This new data shows that, in the current stressful environment, modification strategies that result in unchanged or increased mortgage payments run the risk of unacceptably high re-default rates,” Comptroller of the Currency John Dugan said in a statement.

The Obama administration is aiming to help up to 9 million borrowers stay in their homes through refinanced mortgages or modified loans. It is spending $75 billion to provide lenders an incentive to alter more loans.

Still, the faltering economy, driven down by the collapse of the housing bubble, is causing the housing crisis to spread.

Among the loans surveyed in the report, just over 10 percent were delinquent or in foreclosure, compared with 7 percent at the end of September, the report said. Delinquencies are increasing the most among prime loans made to borrowers with strong credit, it said.

Share

Comments

Capitalism versus Welfare State, I Can’t Tell the Difference Anymore

Economic plans by Democrats versus Republicans, Liberals versus Conservatives, all are off target. In my honest opinion, I don’t think either party’s economic plans will work. Neither address the issue that Americans can’t support a standard of living that they desire, an extravagant and self centered culture promoted by media and banks all so willing to lend you the money, and a government and economy controlled by the super wealthy to funnel wealth to them.

As of 2001, the top 20% of the country controlled about 85% of the country’s total net worth.

In 1983, the top 20% of the country controlled about 81% of the country’s total net worth. Up 4%.

As each decade goes by, the weath continues to be funnelled upwards, squeezing the remaining 80% of the people in the United States. Worse for the bottom 15%. (Data source: http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html)

This is across both Democratic and Republican controlled White House and Congress.

And we witness this everyday and we accept it. The laws protect businesses more than individuals. Wealth hides behind legal corporate structures and are better protected than individual bankruptcy laws. Individuals bare more tax burden for the country than corporations. Between individual income tax and social security, the Federal government in 2008 collects nearly 85% of its tax revenue while corporations only had to carry the rest.  (Data source: http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0104655.html)

How many of us know all those “executive perks” for top management?  John Thain was redecorating his office while Merrill Lynch was in dire trouble and using taxpayer’s money, he was paying out bonuses to the top ranks and laying off the lower ranks.

How many of us know those lobbyists working for top management influence and infiltrate our government? William Lynn who’s job it was to get government defense business for Raytheon Corporation is now Deputy Secretary of Defense.

So why do laws and government actions continue to disfavor those faceless 80% (240 million Americans)?

This week alone, more 71,400 new job cuts were announced.  Hence, an already impatient President Obama has renewed sense of urgency to convince the holdout Republican Congresspersons to vote for his Economic Stimulus Plan.  Behind close doors, they are negotiating revisions.  But will President Obama be successful if there are fundamental economic philosophical differences?  Texas Congressperson Ron Paul and others believes it’s the absolutely the wrong thing to do because it’s interfering with the free market. In addition, where is the borrowed money coming from?

Ron Paul and Dick Armey on Fox Business News


Direct Link to YouTube [POgNcP9h_k0&hl=en&fs=1]

What do you think?

Share

Comments (1)

« Previous Page « Previous Page Next entries »